Raisin Bank AG v. Tesspay Finance Inc. et al
| Raisin Bank AG |
| Tesspay Finance Inc. and Jeffrey F. Mason |
| 1:2026cv25747 |
| August 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Raisin Bank AG identifying Corporate Parent Raisin SE for Raisin Bank AG (Briz, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) to Defendant TESSPAY FINANCE INC. by Raisin Bank AG (Briz, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ksr) |
| Filing 1 Motion (Complaint) to Confirm International Arbitration Award. Filing fee $405.00 receipt number BFLSDC-19902541, filed by Raisin Bank AG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A-1, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(Briz, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
