Cepeda Vivas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Wendy Maria Cepeda Vivas |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Markwayne Mullin, Joseph Edlow and Varsenik Papazian |
| 1:2026cv25864 |
| August 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Joseph Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, Varsenik Papazian, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief under the Administrative Procedures Act against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19917372, filed by Wendy Maria Cepeda Vivas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) US Attorney, #3 Summon(s) DHS, #4 Summon(s) Edlow, #5 Summon(s) Mullin, #6 Summon(s) US Local Attorney, #7 Summon(s) Papazian, #8 Summon(s) USCIS)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Burgos, Alice) Modified text on 8/27/2026 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.