Carrillo Leon et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Erickson Carrillo Leon and Carla Cardenas Santos |
| Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Field Office Director, Director of USCIS Miami Field Office |
| 1:2026cv26466 |
| September 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Field Office Director, Director of USCIS Miami Field Office, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (vvb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. (vvb) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-20008098, filed by Erickson Carrillo Leon, Carla Cardenas Santos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s), #8 Summon(s), #9 Summon(s), #10 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Soto, Eduardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.