Hunsinger v. Leehi International
Plaintiff: John Hunsinger
Defendant: Leehi International
Case Number: 2:2008cv14315
Filed: August 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Real Property: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Frank J. Lynch
Presiding Judge: K. Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 23:1441 Contract Real Estate

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER AND OPINION granting 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 57 Motion for investigation ; denying 69 Motion for Court to file Lis Penden ; denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 6/23/2010. (ir)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunsinger v. Leehi International
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hunsinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leehi International
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?