Sherman et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Edith Sherman and William Sherman |
Ford Motor Company, Krystal Enterprises, Inc. and Krystal Koach, Inc. |
2:2010cv14275 |
October 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ft. Pierce Office |
St. Lucie |
Frank J Lynch |
Jose E Martinez |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinezon 8/4/2011. (ots) |
Filing 17 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Motion Hearing held on 8/4/2011 re #11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Without Prejudice filed by William Sherman, Edith Sherman. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) |
Filing 16 ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Without Prejudice: Telephonic Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2011 at 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/22/2011. (wh) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Anne Long on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Long, Sarah) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #9 Order to Show Cause, by Ford Motor Company, Edith Sherman, William Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order on Stipulation in Bankruptcy)(Long, Sarah) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Without Prejudice and Response to Show Cause Order filed by Ford Motor Company. Replies due by 7/25/2011. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order on Stipulation in Bankruptcy)(Long, Sarah) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Party by Edith Sherman, William Sherman (Gillen, Patrick) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Without Prejudice by Edith Sherman, William Sherman. Responses due by 8/1/2011 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillen, Patrick) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company (McDonald, Francis) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, the parties shall show cause by filing their joint scheduling report and certificates of interested parties in accordance with the Court's previous order. Show Cause Response due on or before 7/15/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/7/2011. (wh) |
Filing 8 ORDER Staying Case as to Defendants Krystal Enterprises, Inc and Krystal Koach, Inc Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/6/2010. (ots) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Daniels Lawrence on behalf of Krystal Enterprises, Inc., Krystal Koach, Inc. (Lawrence, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY as to Krystal Koach, Inc. by Krystal Enterprises, Inc., Krystal Koach, Inc. (Lawrence, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(McDonald, Francis) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/21/2010. (dq) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company, Krystal Enterprises, Inc., Krystal Koach, Inc.. (jc) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment RE: Electronic Complaint to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch, Jr (jc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company, Krystal Enterprises, Inc., Krystal Koach, Inc.. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-3243327, filed by Edith Sherman, William Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))(Gillen, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.