Echols v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Echols
Defendant: R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv14215
Filed: May 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Pierce Office
County: St. Lucie
Presiding Judge: K. Michael Moore
Presiding Judge: Frank J. Lynch
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting Defendants' 70 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/15/2014. (cgn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Echols v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company
Represented By: John Phillip Wiederhold
Represented By: John Fachet Yarber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Echols
Represented By: Lorenzo Williams
Represented By: Arnold S. Gaines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?