Hoyt v. First Watch Restaurant, Inc.
| Janet Hoyt |
| First Watch Restaurant, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv14216 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft Pierce Office |
| Martin (Office: Ft Pierce) |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Shaniek M Maynard |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE by Janet Hoyt (Weiss, Jason) |
Filing 8
FINAL ORDER of DISMISSAL re #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Dismissing Action without prejudice; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/19/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Janet Hoyt (Weiss, Jason) |
|
Filing 6
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/13/2018. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The time for filing response is extended up to an including August 1, 2018. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/28/2018. (tda)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by First Watch Restaurant, Inc.. Attorney Meagan Leigh Martin added to party First Watch Restaurant, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - proposed Order)(Martin, Meagan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to First Watch Restaurant, Inc.. (rms1) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (rms1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Watch Restaurant, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10718663, filed by Janet Hoyt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Weiss, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoyt v. First Watch Restaurant, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janet Hoyt | |
| Represented By: | Jason Stuart Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Watch Restaurant, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Meagan Leigh Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
