Macias v. Barton transportation, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mario Macias
Defendant: Charlotte L Warren and Barton Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv14515
Filed: December 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Shaniek M Maynard
Referring Judge: Robin L Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Patrick Carrigan on behalf of Barton Transportation, Inc., Charlotte L Warren. Attorney John Patrick Carrigan added to party Barton Transportation, Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney John Patrick Carrigan added to party Charlotte L Warren(pty:dft). (Carrigan, John)
February 6, 2019 Filing 12 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint by Barton Transportation, Inc., Charlotte L Warren. (Earle, David)
February 6, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David Brian Earle on behalf of Barton Transportation, Inc., Charlotte L Warren. Attorney David Brian Earle added to party Barton Transportation, Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney David Brian Earle added to party Charlotte L Warren(pty:dft). (Earle, David)
February 1, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Mediation Hearing. Robyn S. Hankins, Esq. selected. Mediation Hearing set for 3/14/2019. (Hankins, Robyn)
January 31, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Mario Macias. (Robbins, Rose)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 1/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
January 18, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #4 Amended Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Mario Macias. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit)(Robbins, Rose)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, CALENDAR CALL, PRETRIAL DEADLINES, AND TRIAL DATE, ORDER OF REQUIREMENTS, ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MEDIATION: (Fact Discovery due by 5/16/2019., Expert Discovery due by 5/30/2019., Jury Trial set for 9/16/2019 09:00 AM in Fort Pierce Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Calendar Call set for 9/11/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Status Conference set for 7/31/2019 09:30 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.), ( Mediation Deadline 03/15/2019.). Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 1/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF COURT-MANDATED REQUIREMENTS IN FLSA-BASED CASES; The Plaintiff is ORDERED to file with the Court a statement of claim setting forth the amount of the alleged unpaid wages, the calculation of such wages, and the nature of the wages (e.g. overtime or regular) within (21) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 01/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
January 13, 2019 Filing 4 Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mario Macias.(Robbins, Rose)
December 19, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jao)
December 19, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
December 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11254656, filed by Mario Macias. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Robbins, Rose)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Macias v. Barton transportation, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlotte L Warren
Represented By: John Patrick Carrigan
Represented By: David Brian Earle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barton Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: John Patrick Carrigan
Represented By: David Brian Earle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Macias
Represented By: Rose Hinda Robbins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?