Doss v. SNYDER et al
| Richard Scott Doss |
| Deputy Warren A. Moore, SHERIFF WILLIAM D SNYDER, Deputy Mark D Budensiek, Deputy Guerrero, Martin County Sheriff's Department and Lieutenant Wilkerson |
| 2:2019cv14016 |
| January 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kenneth A Marra |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to #7 Response to Motion, by Richard Scott Doss (ls) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), -In support of - by Mark D Budensiek, Martin County Sheriff's Department, Warren A. Moore, WILLIAM D SNYDER. (Joss, Harrison) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Richard Scott Doss. Replies due by 2/27/2019. (ls) |
Filing 6
ORDER FOR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS re #5 on or before March 14, 2019, Plaintiff must file a response in opposition to the Defendants' joint motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement. ( Responses due by 3/14/2019) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 2/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Mark D Budensiek, Martin County Sheriff's Department, Warren A. Moore, WILLIAM D SNYDER. Attorney Harrison Adan Joss added to party Martin County Sheriff's Department(pty:dft). Responses due by 2/12/2019 (Joss, Harrison) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): Lieutenant Wilkerson, Deputy Guerrero and Martin County Sheriff's Office. (Joss, Harrison) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - First Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11314398, filed by Deputy Warren A. Moore, Deputy Mark D Budensiek, WILLIAM D SNYDER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Removal from State Case, #2 Exhibit Composite Exhibit 1)(Joss, Harrison) No Answer / Motion to Dismiss filed. Text Modified on 1/16/2019 (pcs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
