Carrano v. GEICO General Insurance Company
| Michael Carrano and Kimberly Carrano |
| GEICO General Insurance Company |
| 2:2019cv14144 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Shaniek M Maynard |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court (Indian River County Court Case 31-2017-CA-000906), #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court (Indian River County Court Case 31-2017-CA-000906) filed by Kimberly Carrano, Michael Carrano Recommending Plaintiff's Motion for Remand DE#6 be filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. Replies due by 7/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Turner, Scott) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court (Indian River County Court Case 31-2017-CA-000906) filed by Kimberly Carrano, Michael Carrano Recommending Plaintiff's Motion for Remand DE#6 be Granted and that this Case be Remanded back to the 19th Judicial Circuit in and for Indian River County, Florida.. Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 6/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge SHANIEK M. M AYNARD for all matters relating to Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand (ECF No. 6).. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court (Indian River County Court Case 31-2017-CA-000906) by Kimberly Carrano, Michael Carrano. (Beam, Riley) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Court Practice in Removal Cases. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (dq) |
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Carrano v. Geico State Court Complaint) Filing fee $400.00. IFP Filed, filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Turner, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
