Gregory v. Florida Department of Corrections
Celestor Ortez Gregory |
Florida Department of Corrections |
2:2019cv14183 |
May 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jose E Martinez |
Lisette M Reid |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document. Answer due 8/19/2019 Re: #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Celestor Ortez Gregory. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/18/2019. (rm01) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #5 Order to Show Cause, by Florida Department of Corrections. (Bettendorf, Heidi) |
Filing 7 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 6/10/2019 in the amount of $5.00, receipt number FLS900006405 (jas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Heidi L. Bettendorf on behalf of Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Heidi L. Bettendorf added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Bettendorf, Heidi) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five days from the date of this order the respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 7/1/2019. Motions due by 7/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (kpe) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Celestor Ortez Gregory. Filing fee $ 5.00. NOT PAID/NO IFP FILED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gregory v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections | |
Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North |
Represented By: | Heidi L. Bettendorf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Celestor Ortez Gregory | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.