Walsh v. 19th Judicial Circuit Court
Petitioner: Thomas Walsh
Respondent: 19th Judicial Circuit Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv14334
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Robin L Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2019 Filing 14 PAPERLESS Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid/Case Closed by the District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/7/2019. (br)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER adopting #10 Report and Recommendations and dismissing case without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Report. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg (bkd)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff filed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to submit the supporting statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months for any institutional account in his name. Plaintiff has been previously instructed on this requirement. [See ECF 5]. Thus, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis must be denied. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/5/2019. (ac01)
November 5, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas Walsh. (drz)
October 21, 2019 Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Thomas Walsh; Recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint ECF #1 be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee. Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER STRIKING #8 Notice (Other) filed by Thomas Walsh. The Court has previously instructed Plaintiff that all documents must be filed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, no letters to the Court will be answered, and that letters are not motions or pleadings and are therefore not docketed in the case. [See ECF 4 p. 4 para. 8]. Plaintiff's Notice [ECF 8]does not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court's Instructions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Notice [ECF 8] be STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/18/2019. (ac01)
October 18, 2019 Filing 8 STRICKEN NOTICE of Filing 19th Judicial Circuit Court Case Documents/Exhibits by Thomas Walsh. (drz) Modified on 10/18/2019 stricken per de#9(dj).
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #6 Motion for Writ on Supervisory Control. Plaintiff seeks to have this Court order the state court to take certain actions in his criminal case. This Court will not interfere in Plaintiff's ongoing state court criminal proceeding. See generally, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/8/2019. (ac01)
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Writ of Supervisory Control by Thomas Walsh. (drz)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 10/7/2019. Motions due by 10/7/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Case not filed with required filing fees of $ 400.00 (civil cases=$400.00, memo cases=$47.00, habeas cases=$5.00) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Summons(es) will not be issued until the filing fee is paid or an order granting the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is entered. (cga)
September 9, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (cga)
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against 19th Judicial Circuit Court. Filing fee $ 400.00 NOT PAID. No IFP Motion filed by Thomas Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Clerk of Court)(cga)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walsh v. 19th Judicial Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: 19th Judicial Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?