Edmondson v. Saul
| Sherry Edmondson |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 2:2020cv14211 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Shaniek M Maynard |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ail) |
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. The Plaintiff may proceed without paying the filing fee. However this Court is not directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the Defendant with process. Instead it is the Plaintiffs responsibility to serve the Defendant with the summons and copies of the Complaint in compliance with Rule 4(i), Fed.R.Civ.P. The Plaintiff promptly shall file the Returns of Service. The Defendant shall answer the Complaint within sixty (60) days of the service of process date, as Rule 12(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., requires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 7/9/2020. (ip00)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Sherry Edmondson (Zakhvatayev, Mark) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sherry Edmondson. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Sherry Edmondson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Zakhvatayev, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edmondson v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherry Edmondson | |
| Represented By: | Mark V Zakhvatayev |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
