Gilchrist v. Scott et al
Ramon E. Gilchrist |
Brett Peters, Spencer Scott, St. Lucie County and Ken Mascara |
2:2020cv14232 |
July 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Lisette M Reid |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH FINANCAIL AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 7/27/2020. Motions due by 7/27/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP form) (br) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (br) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ramon E. Gilchrist. (drz) Modified on 7/14/2020 (mr1). |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Ken Mascara, Brett Peters, Spencer Scott, St. Lucie County. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Ramon E. Gilchrist.(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.