Ferraro v. Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Gregory Angelo Ferraro
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2020cv14431
Filed: November 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodolfo A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2020 Filing 9 AMENDED PETITION against Florida Department of Corrections filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Gregory Angelo Ferraro.(amb)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program. Because Petitioner has not provided an amended petition, the Court cannot determine whether this case may require attorney assistance. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II (bca)
December 29, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Gregory Angelo Ferraro. (amb)
December 29, 2020 Filing 6 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 12/29/2020 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS100221112. (jcs)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO AMEND re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory Angelo Ferraro. Petitioner is hereby ordered to file a concise, 2254 petition on the proper form, which shall be due in this Court no later than January 6, 2021, setting forth each ground for relief with sufficient supporting facts. The Clerk shall send Petitioner a copy of the form for use in Section 2254 cases. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to affix the civil case number listed above on the form. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 12/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 28:2254 Habeas Petition Form) (daa)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING FEE OR IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION. Filing Fee due by 1/4/2021. Motions due by 1/4/2021. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 12/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP form) (daa)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE HABEAS PETITIONERS. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 12/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (daa)
November 30, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. (daa)
November 30, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Gregory Angelo Ferraro.(daa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferraro v. Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Angelo Ferraro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?