Treasure Coast Commerce Center Condominium Association, Inc. v. Safety Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Treasure Coast Commerce Center Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant: Safety Specialty Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2020cv14439
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Shaniek M Maynard
Referring Judge: K Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE and ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION: ( Jury Trial set for 2/28/2022 09:30 AM in Fort Pierce Division before Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard., Telephonic Calendar Call set for 2/23/2022 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard., Amended Pleadings due by 2/26/2021., Discovery due by 10/29/2021., Expert Discovery due by 10/29/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 2/26/2021., In Limine Motions due by 12/30/2021., Dispositive Motions due by 11/30/2021., Motions due by 12/30/2021., Pretrial Stipulation due by 1/14/2022.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 1/13/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. Modified to correct Motions deadline text on 1/13/2021 (asl).
January 13, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines. PER DE#9 Motions due by 12/30/2021. (cds)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Magistrate Judge Rule 1(h) of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, and with the consent of the parties, as stated in the Parties' Joint Scheduling Conference Report #7 , the above-captioned cause is referred entirely to United States Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard to take all necessary and proper action as required by law, including, if necessary, a jury or non-jury trial and entry of final judgment. In the course of conducting any such proceedings, Magistrate Judge Maynard may hear and determine any and all pre-trial and post-trial motions, including case-dispositive motions. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/6/2021. (tgr)
January 6, 2021 Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Safety Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Joint Proposed Scheduling Order)(Tom, Jason)
December 17, 2020 Filing 6 Defendant Safety Specialty Insurance Company's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Safety Specialty Insurance Company. (Tom, Jason)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 12/11/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHANIEK MAYNARD. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shaniek Maynard to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Maynard's discovery procedures. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/10/2020. (tgr)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of a Notice of Removal. Counsel for the removing party is hereby ORDERED to forward a copy of this Order to all other parties. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a Joint Scheduling Report. The report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial and the estimated number of days required for trial. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer, or may offer, if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (A) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (B) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address, and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibility of a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report may result in remand or dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The filing of a motion to dismiss, or other motion, does not toll the time for filing a joint scheduling report. Counsel for the non-removing party must file a motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Notice of Removal. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one-inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/10/2020. (tgr)
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds)
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's Complaint for Breach of Contract & Demand for Jury Trial) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14014058, filed by Safety Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Part 1, #2 Exhibit Ex A Part 2, #3 Exhibit Ex A Part 3, #4 Exhibit Ex B, #5 Complaint, #6 Docket Sheet Docket Sheet)(Jones, Kimberly) Text Modified on 12/10/2020 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Treasure Coast Commerce Center Condominium Association, Inc. v. Safety Specialty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safety Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Kimberly Michelle Gracia Jones
Represented By: Jason Frederick Tom
Represented By: Vincent Paul Beilman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Treasure Coast Commerce Center Condominium Association, Inc.
Represented By: John Daniel Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?