Martin v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Stephanie Martin |
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company |
2:2021cv14151 |
April 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Kenneth A Marra |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent GeoVera Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Michaela D. Scheihing, Other Affiliate Orlando Romero, Other Affiliate GeoVera Advantage Insurance Services, Inc., Other Affiliate GeoVera Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Coastal Select Insurance Company, Other Affiliate The Property Advocates, P.A. fka The Strems Law Firm, P.A., Other Affiliate Southeast Law Group, P.A. for GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company (Scheihing, Michaela) |
Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company. (Scheihing, Michaela) |
Filing 4 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Stephanie Martin (Romero, Orlando) |
Filing 3 Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (ir) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Stephanie Martin v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co.) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14571108, filed by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7)(Scheihing, Michaela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martin v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stephanie Martin | |
Represented By: | Orlando Jesus Romero |
Represented By: | Nicolle Bryana Barrantes |
Represented By: | Glenda Maria Almela |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Michaela Denise Scheihing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.