Chisolm v. Brock et al
| Deondre M. Chisolm |
| Highlands County Sheriff's Office, Jonathan Garcia, John L. Singha and Officer Alexandria M. Brock |
| 2:2021cv14256 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART AND STAYING COMPLAINT IN PART. Plaintiff's motion for in forma pauperis status [ECF No. 4] is GRANTED. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deondre M. Chisolm. (scn) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 7/23/2021. Motions due by 7/23/2021. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Alexandria M. Brock, Jonathan Garcia, Highlands County Sheriff's Office, John L. Singha. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Deondre M. Chisolm.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
