Feltzin v. Emerald Jude Holdings LLC
| Lawrence Feltzin |
| Emerald Jude Holdings LLC |
| 2:2021cv14463 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Lawrence Feltzin (Fuller, John) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Emerald Jude Holdings LLC identifying Other Affiliate John Martino, Other Affiliate Florida Commercial Enterprises, LLC for Emerald Jude Holdings LLC (Zweben, Gene) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Lawrence Feltzin (Fuller, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gene Richard Zweben on behalf of Emerald Jude Holdings LLC (Zweben, Gene) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Emerald Jude Holdings LLC. Attorney Gene Richard Zweben added to party Emerald Jude Holdings LLC(pty:dft). (Zweben, Gene) |
Filing 5
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 1/28/2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 12/20/2021. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Lawrence Feltzin. Emerald Jude Holdings LLC served on 12/13/2021, response/answer due 1/3/2022. (Fuller, John) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Emerald Jude Holdings LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Injunctive Relief against Emerald Jude Holdings LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15218826, filed by Lawrence Feltzin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons)(Fuller, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Feltzin v. Emerald Jude Holdings LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lawrence Feltzin | |
| Represented By: | John Paul Fuller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Emerald Jude Holdings LLC | |
| Represented By: | Gene Richard Zweben |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
