Keenan et al v. Garland
Ashlee N. Keenan and Kyle J. Keenan |
Merrick B. Garland |
2:2021cv14506 |
December 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Clerk's Notice Administratively Closing Case Due To Duplication of Filing - The Clerk notices all parties to this action as follows: 1. Case number 21-14506-CIV-MARTINEZ/MAYNARD is hereby administratively closed. 2. All papers hereafter filed shall bear the following case number followed by the surname of the assigned Judicial Officers as follows: 21-14505-CIV-CANNON/MAYNARD No further entries will be made on this case. (jc) (jc). |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency (mee) Modified text on 12/30/2021 (jc). |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #1 Complaint filed by Kyle J. Keenan, Ashlee N. Keenan. Document(s) were filed conventionally that should have been filed electronically (CM/ECF Administrative Procedures). (mee) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. (mee) Modified text on 12/30/2021 (jc). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland. Filing fees $ 402.00 filed by Ashlee N. Keenan, Kyle J. Keenan. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(mee) |
Judge Jose E. Martinez no longer assigned to case. (jc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.