Robinson v. Warden, Okeechobee C.I.
| Vandarren E. Robinson, Vanerren Robinson and Vandareen E. Robinson |
| Warden, Okeechobee C.I. |
| 2:2022cv14093 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Warden, Okeechobee C.I., filed by Vandareen E. Robinson.(jas) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND GRANTING IFP MOTION. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint by May 1, 2022 consistent with this Order. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP [ECF No. #3 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff has included a statement certifying his indigency and an accompanying six-month account statement [ECF No. #3 ]. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 4/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) form) (daa)
|
| Filing 3 IMPLIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vandareen E. Robinson. (jas) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/31/2022) (jas). |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Warden, Okeechobee C.I.. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Vandarren E. Robinson.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
