Cohan v. RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Jimmy Johns Gourmet Subs #1619 |
| 2:2022cv14139 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
Filing 8
ORDER Administratively Closing Case upon #7 Notice of Settlement; Parties Stipulation for Dismissal due 6/24/2022; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 25, 2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/12/2022. (jrt)
|
| Reset Deadlines RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. answer due 5/25/2022 Per DE#6. (cqs) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint by RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc.. Attorney Justin Canner Sorel added to party RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 5/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sorel, Justin) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. served on 4/20/2022, response/answer due 5/11/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. (mab) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15563106, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Lyn Simpson |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RJM Gourmet Sandwiches Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Jimmy Johns Gourmet Subs #1619 | |
| Represented By: | Justin Canner Sorel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
