McGill v. Florida Department of Corrections
| Rodney McGill |
| Florida Department of Corrections |
| 2:2022cv14175 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw Document Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Get Documents from Institution by Rodney McGill. Responses due by 7/7/2022 (pes) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Get Documents from Institution by Rodney McGill. Responses due by 7/5/2022 (pes) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION. On or before June 25, 2022, Petitioner must file a notice with the Court in which he agrees to the characterization of his filing [DE #1 ] as a petition for federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254; or withdraws the subject pleading, rather than have the Court recharacterize it as a 2254 petition. The amended petition must comply with the applicable rules of procedure set forth in this order and cure the pleading deficiencies identified in this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the form for 2254 petitions maintained by the Clerk to Petitioner, together with this Order. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus form) (daa)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING FEE OR IFP MOTION. On or before June 15, 2022, Petitioner shall either pay the Clerk's filing fee of $5.00 or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with supporting financial affidavit, and the six-month account statement in accordance with Rule 3(a) of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings in the District Courts. The Clerk shall mail a copy of the approved form motion to proceed in forma pauperis to Petitioner along with this Order. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (daa)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. (daa) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Rodney McGill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McGill v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rodney McGill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
