Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Michael Deshawn Johnson
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2022cv14280
Filed: August 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Florida Department of Corrections re #9 Response to Order to Show Cause (Attachments: #1 Transcripts Trial Transcript) (Bettendorf, Heidi)
September 19, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE by Florida Department of Corrections re #9 Response to Order to Show Cause (Attachments: #1 Appendix Exhibits 1 thru 31, #2 Appendix Exhibits 32 thru 39, #3 Appendix Exhibit 39 (cont.), #4 Appendix Exhibits 39 (cont.) thru 40, #5 Appendix Exhibit 40 (cont.), #6 Appendix Exhibit 40 (cont.) thru 49) (Bettendorf, Heidi)
September 19, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, by Florida Department of Corrections. (Bettendorf, Heidi)
September 8, 2022 Filing 8 PAPERLESS Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 9/7/2022 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS256818. (vt)
August 15, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Heidi L. Bettendorf on behalf of Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Heidi L. Bettendorf added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Bettendorf, Heidi)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/9/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Deshawn Johnson. Show Cause Response due by 8/16/2022. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/9/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 5.00. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/9/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
August 8, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Deshawn Johnson. (daa)
August 8, 2022 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. (daa)
August 8, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Michael Deshawn Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(daa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Deshawn Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North
Represented By: Heidi L. Bettendorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?