Doherty v. St. Lucie County et al
| Keith Robert Doherty |
| St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County Public Defender's Office, Diamond Litty and Stephen Hooper |
| 2:2022cv14287 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT ("PLRA"). The Complaint (DE #1 ) is DISMISSED (a) with prejudice as to the claims brought under Section 1983 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (b) without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as to the remaining state law claims. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and, The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 8/17/2022. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Robert Doherty. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Stephen Hooper, Diamond Litty, St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County Public Defender's Office. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Keith Robert Doherty.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
