St Fleur et al v. City of Fort Pierce, Florida et al
Deondravious Lamar St Fleur and Troystavious Jamar Hewitt |
Ft. Pierce City, Justin Gullet, Atilano Garcia, Charles Davis and City of Fort Pierce, Florida |
2:2022cv14414 |
December 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Aileen M Cannon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #9 Summons Returned Executed. Incorrect Service Date Entered; ERROR - The incorrect service date was entered. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see DE# 10 . It is not necessary to refile this document. (jas) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #6 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Deondravious Lamar St Fleur, Troystavious Jamar Hewitt. City of Fort Pierce, Florida served on 2/8/2023, response/answer due 3/1/2023; Charles Davis served on 2/9/2023, response/answer due 3/2/2023; Atilano Garcia served on 2/9/2023, response/answer due 3/2/2023; Justin Gullet served on 2/8/2023, response/answer due 3/1/2023. (See DE# 9-1, 9-2, 9-3, and 9-4 for document images). (jas) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #6 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Deondravious Lamar St Fleur, Troystavious Jamar Hewitt. City of Fort Pierce, Florida served on 2/6/2023, response/answer due 2/27/2023; Charles Davis served on 2/6/2023, response/answer due 2/27/2023; Atilano Garcia served on 2/6/2023, response/answer due 2/27/2023; Justin Gullet served on 2/6/2023, response/answer due 2/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Return of Service, #2 Summon(s) Return of Service, #3 Summon(s) Return of service, #4 Summon(s) Return of Service)(Kollin, Gary) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to City of Fort Pierce, Florida, Charles Davis, Atilano Garcia, Justin Gullet. (jas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Troystavious Jamar Hewitt, Deondravious Lamar St Fleur re #6 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit summons, #2 Exhibit summons, #3 Exhibit summons, #4 Exhibit summons) (Kollin, Gary) |
Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Deondravious Lamar St Fleur, Troystavious Jamar Hewitt.(Kollin, Gary) |
|
Filing 4 Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee $402.00, receipt number AFLSDC-16170456, Electronic Civil Case Filing re 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, (Kollin, Gary) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $402.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (rbe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 402.00, filed by Deondravious Lamar St Fleur, Troystavious Jamar Hewitt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kollin, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.