Clark v. Modtek Roofing, Inc.
| Dennis Clark |
| Modtek Roofing, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv14261 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Jonathan Partlow on behalf of Modtek Roofing, Inc.. Attorney Eric Jonathan Partlow added to party Modtek Roofing, Inc.(pty:dft). (Partlow, Eric) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #9 Order, Set Response/Answer Due Deadline. (Modtek Roofing, Inc. C/O Luke McConnel, Registered Agent) (drz) |
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT re #6 Summons Returned Executed filed by Dennis Clark, Modtek Roofing, Inc. response/answer due 10/26/2023. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #7 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings (Order Mailed to Modtek Roofing, Inc. C/O Luke McConnel, Registered Agent) (drz) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING CORPORATE DEFENDANT TO OBTAIN COUNSEL, ( Deadline to obtain new counsel 10/19/2023.) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Dennis Clark. Modtek Roofing, Inc. served on 9/5/2023, response/answer due 9/26/2023. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dennis Clark (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Pictures) (wce) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Modtek Roofing, Inc. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Modtek Roofing, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16870171, filed by Dennis Clark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photograph, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Modtek Roofing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dennis Clark | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Modtek Roofing, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Jonathan Partlow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
