Cadejuste v. City of Ft. Pierce et al
| Marco Thony Cadejuste |
| City of Ft. Pierce, County of St. Lucie, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #7, David Teitelbaun, Ashton Tucker, (Unknown) Bernadini, (Unknown) Nikitenko, John Doe #5, Steven Hooper, Tom Bakkedahl, Diamond Litty and Jane/John Doe |
| 2:2023cv14274 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER Staying Case. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. All pending litigation deadlines are STAYED pending the resolution of Plaintiff'sappeal. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/11/2023. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 21 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM by Marco Thony Cadejuste re #16 Notice of Appeal,. No Transcript Requested. (No hearings were held in our court for this case.) (apz) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER denying #15 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 19 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #16 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marco Thony Cadejuste. Date received by USCA: 9/29/2023. USCA Case Number: 23-13207-B. (apz) |
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Pro Se Instructions to Marco Thony Cadejuste re #16 Notice of Appeal. (apz) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE/Motion for Clerk to Compile Records on Appeal Rule (10)b by Marco Thony Cadejuste re #16 Notice of Appeal. (The record on appeal is available electronically to the appellate court.) (apz) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appeal re #11 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines, #13 Order on Motion for Hearing by Marco Thony Cadejuste. IFP Filed. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (apz) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (kpe) Modified text on 9/29/2023 to reflect motion for IFP is related to NOA(apz). |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(kpe) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Orders under appeal, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #16 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER DENYING #12 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REHEARING. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/22/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Rehearing by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (kpe) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE OF MAILING A COPY OF #8 ORDER, per #8 ORDER. (caw) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT (PLRA). The Plaintiff's Complaint (DE 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; On or before OCTOBER 6, 2023, Plaintiff may, if he so chooses, file an Amended Complaint using the authorized form that accompanies this Order, curing the deficiencies identified in this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file the Amended Complaint on or before OCTOBER 6, 2023, will result in the entry of an order dismissing this case. (Amended Complaint due by 10/6/2023.) Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion Judicial Notice. The Motion is GRANTED solely to the extent that I will consider filings in this case and in State v. Cadejuste, supra. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 350.00. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE OF MAILING FORM: COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, per #5 ORDER. (caw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT (PLRA) Amended Complaint due by 10/6/2023. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION To Judicially Notice by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (amb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. (amb) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against (Unknown) Bernadini, City of Ft. Pierce, County of St. Lucie, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #7, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, (Unknown) Nikitenko, David Teitelbaun, Ashton Tucker. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Marco Thony Cadejuste. (Attachments: #1 Appendix to Footnotes of Legally Proffered Advisements, #2 Appendix to 1983 Tort Complaint)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
