Scott v. Dixon
| Ray Eugene Scott |
| Ricky D Dixon |
| 2:2023cv14282 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #9 Statement Of Petitioner/ MOTION for Re-Hearing. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal by Ray Eugene Scott. Responses due by 10/24/2023 (apz) |
| Filing 9 Statement Of Petitioner/ MOTION for Re-Hearing. by Ray Eugene Scott. (cqs) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Request Court Appointed Counsel (Responses due by 10/12/2023), Evidentiary Hearings, Video Conference(s) and Leniency towards any timeliness issues by Ray Eugene Scott. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7)(ebz) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Dismissing Case / Closing Case. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/21/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance mailed Copy of DE #4 Order and Exhibits to Ray Eugene Scott DC434936/SID 4177443 Western C.I. 13800 McMullen Hwy, S.W. Cumberland, MD 21502. (ebz) |
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Docketing Exhibits attached per #4 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (ebz) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DIRECTIONS TO CLERK Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (mh02)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 9/11/2023 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number 3289 (scn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore (pcs) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00, filed by Ray Eugene Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(pcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Dixon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ray Eugene Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ricky D Dixon | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
