Brabham v. Resilard et al
| Kenneth Ray Brabham |
| Y. Resilard, J French, Bowain, J. Holtz, Michelle Hall, Reason and Unknown |
| 2:2023cv14318 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order Dismissing/Closing Case. MOTION to Amend/Correct re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens ( Responses due by 12/22/2023) by Kenneth Ray Brabham. (nwn) |
Filing 6
ORDER Dismissing Case / Closing Case. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/17/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Instructions. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (mh02)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Ray Brabham. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Y. Resilard et al. Filing fee $ 402.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Kenneth Ray Brabham.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
