Prater v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
| Allen K Prater |
| Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2023cv14321 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ryon M McCabe |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Based on Supplemental Rule 3 for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe on 10/20/2023. (jb02)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY CASE PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe on 10/19/2023. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Clifford M. Farrell, mailing date October 19, 2023, (pt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Allen K Prater. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Allen K Prater. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Indegency)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Kushner, Jonas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
