Falcon v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Diana A. Falcon |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2024cv14059 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/11/2024. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement and REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE by Diana A. Falcon (Ortiz, Nick) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Diana A. Falcon (Ortiz, Nick) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tanya Irene Suarez on behalf of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #4 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was Not re-docketed by the Clerk. In the future please use Notice of Appearance. (cqs) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17335544, filed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Suarez, Tanya) (No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss Filed) Modified Text on 3/1/2024 (wce). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Falcon v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diana A. Falcon | |
| Represented By: | Nick Anthony Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tanya Irene Suarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
