Selph et al v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Kathleen M. Selph and Carl Arthur Selph |
Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC |
2:2024cv14091 |
April 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC. (nan) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17411498, filed by Kathleen M. Selph, Carl Arthur Selph. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons EQ, #3 Summon(s) Proposed Summons EXP, #4 Summon(s) Proposed Summons TU)(Kerney, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.