Bailey, Keiontae v. Martin Correctional Institution et al
| Keiontae Renard Bailey |
| Classification Officer, Colonel, Captain Binncce and Martin Correctional Institution |
| 2:2024cv14366 |
| November 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance re #5 Order Dismissing/Closing Case: Order mailed to Plaintiff. (pcs) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL / Closing Case. (Without Prejudice) , denying #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Keiontae Renard Bailey. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 11/15/2024. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 11/15/2024. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keiontae Renard Bailey. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Captain Binncce, Classification Officer, Colonel, Martin Correctional Institution. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Keiontae Renard Bailey.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.