Young et al v. The City of Sebring
Stephen Patrick Young and Jack Young |
The City of Sebring |
2:2024cv14371 |
November 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ryon M McCabe |
K Michael Moore |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE to #15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by The City of Sebring Recommending the undersigned RECOMMENDS no objections by The City of Sebring. (Olivo, Geraldo) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by The City of Sebring. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion (DE #5 ) be GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to file an Amended Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2025 Signed by Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe on 1/9/2025. See attached document for full details. (nan) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Selected/Added The City of Sebring, Steven Koeppel as Mediator. (Olivo, Geraldo) |
Filing 13 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #12 Notice (Other). Parties/Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the additional parties/mediator - Steven G. Koeppel to serve as mediator in this matter. (nan) |
Filing 12 Defendant's NOTICE of Selection of Mediator by The City of Sebring (Olivo, Geraldo) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by The City of Sebring (Olivo, Geraldo) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance re 7 Order. A copy of the Order was mailed to the Plaintiffs. (nan) |
Set Response Deadline as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), . The Court will sua sponte extend the deadline to respond to December 31, 2024. Responses due by 12/31/2024. (nan) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance by The City of Sebring re 3 Pretrial Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (Olivo, Geraldo) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by The City of Sebring. Responses due by 12/2/2024. (Olivo, Geraldo) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Stephen Patrick Young and Jack P Young v. The City of Sebring) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17987523, filed by The City of Sebring. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, State Court Defendant's Answer & Other State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olivo, Geraldo) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 11/15/2024 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.