Hamlett, Shawn v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Shawn Hamlett |
| Florida Department of Corrections, Sergeant Desire, Sergeant Augustave, Officer S. Brown, Sergeant Knowles and Officer V. Fortt |
| 2:2025cv14293 |
| August 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's Complaint (DE #1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Any other pending motions including the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (DE #3 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Motions terminated: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shawn Hamlett. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/19/2025. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shawn Hamlett. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Augustave, S. Brown, Desire, Florida Department of Corrections, V. Fortt, Knowles. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Shawn Hamlett.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
