Muhammad, Rashad v. Elliott
Plaintiff: Rashad Tariq Muhammad
Defendant: Alexander Elliott
Case Number: 2:2025cv14454
Filed: December 23, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rashad Tariq Muhammad. (kma)
December 23, 2025 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal (kma)
December 23, 2025 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Alexander Elliott. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Rashad Tariq Muhammad.(kma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad, Rashad v. Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rashad Tariq Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexander Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?