Malvezzi, James v. Martin County Courthouse
| James Malvezzi |
| Martin County Courthouse |
| 2:2026cv14076 |
| March 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER of DISMISSAL from USCA. This appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant James Malvezzi failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules re #4 Notice of Appeal, filed by James Malvezzi. USCA 26-10998-H (jgo)
|
| Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #4 Notice of Appeal, filed by James Malvezzi. Date received by USCA: 03/26/2026. USCA Case Number: 26-10998-H. (jgo) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Pro Se Instructions to James Malvezzi re #4 Notice of Appeal. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appeal re #3 Order Dismissing/Closing Case, by James Malvezzi. Filing Fee: NOT PAID. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (jgo) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #4 Notice of Appeal. Notice has been electronically mailed. (jgo) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This case is DISMISSED as duplicative of the First Action currently pending in this Court. Plaintiff may, if he chooses to do so, refile the Complaint filed herein in that proceeding. All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 3/9/2026. See attached document for full details. (wce)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Martin County Courthouse. Filing fee $ 405.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by James Malvezzi. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Pleading, #2 Exhibit)(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malvezzi, James v. Martin County Courthouse | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Malvezzi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin County Courthouse | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
