Barrette v. The United States of America
| Michael Barrette |
| The United States of America |
| 2:2026cv14185 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Shaniek Mills Maynard |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER: Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this case on May 26, 2026, and simultaneously filed a #3 motion to proceed without prepaying fees and costs ("Motion"). However, on June 12, 2026, Plaintiff #7 paid the required filing fee. Considering Plaintiff's payment of the fee, Plaintiff's #3 Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard on 6/23/2026. (hrn) |
| Filing 7 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 6/12/2026 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 3948. (blc) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard on 6/2/2026. See attached document for full details. (blc)
|
| Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This matter involving a pro se litigant was directly assigned to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Order 2025-11. See Administrative Order 2025-11 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2025), available at: https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/adminorders/2025-11.pdf . The parties are advised that they have the right to proceed before a U.S. District Judge, however they may waive this right and voluntarily consent to have a U.S. Magistrate Judge conduct any or all proceedings in this case and to order the entry of a final judgment. Further instructions regarding consent to this process will be issued after other parties involved have made an appearance. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard on 6/2/2026. (hrn) |
| Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Michael Barrette to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: [email protected] (amb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Barrette. Responses due by 6/9/2026. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United States of America. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Michael Barrette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrette v. The United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Barrette | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
