Williams v. NEWREZ LLC
Plaintiff: Kimberly Williams
Defendant: Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Case Number: 2:2026cv14197
Filed: June 4, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Aileen M Cannon
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2026 Filing 13 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Kimberly Williams (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Newhart, Darren)
July 29, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Newrez LLC. Responses due by 8/12/2026. (Suarez, Jorge)
June 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response or Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #10 . On or before July 29, 2026, Defendant shall file a responsive motion or answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/26/2026.
June 25, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by Newrez LLC. Responses due by 7/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Suarez, Jorge)
June 25, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jorge Luis Suarez on behalf of Newrez LLC. Attorney Jorge Luis Suarez added to party Newrez LLC(pty:dft). (Suarez, Jorge)
June 25, 2026 Filing 8 Initial Disclosure(s) of Corporate Disclosure Statement by Newrez LLC (Berwin, Victor)
June 25, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Victor Robert Berwin on behalf of Newrez LLC. Attorney Victor Robert Berwin added to party Newrez LLC(pty:dft). (Berwin, Victor)
June 6, 2026 Filing 6 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Kimberly Williams (Newhart, Darren)
June 6, 2026 Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Kimberly Williams (Newhart, Darren)
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/5/2026.
June 5, 2026 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Newrez LLC. (ksr)
June 4, 2026 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ksr)
June 4, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEWREZ LLC D/B/A, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19619308, filed by Kimberly Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Newhart, Darren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. NEWREZ LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Williams
Represented By: Darren R. Newhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Represented By: Jorge Luis Suarez
Represented By: Victor Robert Berwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?