Townsend v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
| Carla Townsend |
| Boehringer Ingelheim, CHATTEM, INC., GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Pfizer, Sanofi and DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
| 3:2023cv10049 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. More information on informal service can be found in Pretrial Order #13. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 3:23-cv-10049. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim, CHATTEM, INC., DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Pfizer, Sanofi. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16273381, filed by Carla Townsend. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Kassan, Randi) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. (nwn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
