Heestand v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
| Jay Heestand |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Service LLC and Giant Eagle, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv14347 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23cv14347. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (jmd) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. (jmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Jay Heestand against Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Giant Eagle, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Service LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16364775, filed by Jay Heestand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luhana, Roopal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
