Wasserman v. Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Benjamin Wasserman |
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc. and Chattem Inc. |
3:2023cv16600 |
March 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Case Terminated. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. Closing Case. (jc) |
Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23-16600-CIV-ROSENBERG. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (jc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Chattem Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16387255, filed by Benjamin Wasserman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGlamry, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.