Williams v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
Maurice Williams |
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc. |
3:2023cv18740 |
March 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23-cv-18740. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (jas) |
Civil Case Terminated. Case is Stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-md-2924-RLR. (jas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16440942, filed by Maurice Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Badaruzzaman, Asim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.