Johnson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
| William E. Johnson |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, S.A. de C.V., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Patheon Manufacturing Service LLC, Sanofi S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Apotex Corporation, Apotex Inc., Appco Pharma LLC, Auro Health LLC, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Chattem Inc., Denton Pharma Inc. d/b/a Northwind Pharmaceuticals, Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar Tree Store, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, SA, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals Corp., Glenmark Generics Ltd., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, Golden State Medical Supply, Inc., Granules India, Ltd., Granules USA, Inc., L. Perrigo Co., Novitium Pharma LLC, Ranbaxy Inc., Sandoz Inc., Strides Pharma Global Pte. Ltd., Strides Pharma Science Ltd., Strides Pharma, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceticals U.S.A., Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Wockhardt USA LLC, Wockhardt USA Inc. and Wockhardt, Ltd. |
| 3:2023cv20199 |
| March 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Apotex Corporation, Apotex Inc., Appco Pharma LLC, Auro Health LLC, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, S.A. de C.V., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Chattem Inc., Denton Pharma Inc. d/b/a Northwind Pharmaceuticals, Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar Tree Store, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, SA, Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals Corp., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glenmark Generics Ltd., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, Golden State Medical Supply, Inc., Granules India, Ltd., Granules USA, Inc., L. Perrigo Co., Novitium Pharma LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Service LLC, Ranbaxy Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sanofi S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Strides Pharma Global Pte. Ltd., Strides Pharma Science Ltd., Strides Pharma, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceticals U.S.A., Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Wockhardt USA Inc., Wockhardt USA LLC, Wockhardt, Ltd.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16467856, filed by William E. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kraft, Kristine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
