Wireman, Jr. v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
| Kenneth Wireman, Jr. |
| Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corp., Appco Pharma LLC, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Denton Pharma Inc. (Northwind Pharmaceuticals), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Geri-Care, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Glenmark Pharmacueticals, Inc. USA, Golden State Medical Supply, Inc., Granules USA, Inc., L. Perrigo Company, Novitium Pharma, LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Strides Pharma, Inc. (Strides Pharma Global Pte. Ltd.), Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Wockhardt Ltd. |
| 3:2023cv21278 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1407 Multidistrict Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Kenneth Wireman, Jr. against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16485447, filed by Kenneth Wireman, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s), #8 Summon(s), #9 Summon(s), #10 Summon(s), #11 Summon(s), #12 Summon(s), #13 Summon(s), #14 Summon(s), #15 Summon(s), #16 Summon(s), #17 Summon(s), #18 Summon(s), #19 Summon(s), #20 Summon(s))(Elliott, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
