Snider v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
| Robert Snider |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, S.A. de C.V., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (America), Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Patheon Manufacturing Service LLC, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc. |
| 3:2023cv22053 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23-cv-22053. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (aao) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. Closing Case. (aao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16496484, filed by Robert Snider. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hensley, Bryce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
