McKee v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
| Cynthia McKee and Cynthia M. McKee |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, SA de CV, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Chattem, Inc., Southeastern Grocers, Inc. and Walmart Inc. |
| 3:2023cv22324 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Case administratively closed - DUPLICATE CASE FILED. A second attempt to open a case without incurring a new charge should be made by the next business day, if not - our Financial Department will refund the filing fees within 10 business days. Filing fees will be refunded. Amount $402.00, receipt #AFLSDC-16500289, case filed date: 4/4/2023. No further entries will be made on this case. (bb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16500289, filed by Cynthia McKee.(Rieder, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
