Damron et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Franklin Damron and Jennifer Damron |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC, Chattem, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv22534 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jennifer Damron, Franklin Damron.(McGoldrick, Marilyn) |
| Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23-cv-22534. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (kpe) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16503938, filed by Jennifer Damron, Franklin Damron. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGoldrick, Marilyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
