Martin v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
| Linda Martin |
| Boehringer Ingelheim, Chattem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Manufacturing Serivces, LLC, Sanofi and Patheon Manufacturing Services, LLC |
| 3:2023cv22775 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (aao) |
| Filing 2 MDL 2924 Judge Assignment with Tag-Along Case Receipt from the Southern District of Florida. Judge Robin L. Rosenberg assigned FLSD Case Number 23-cv-22775. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-MD-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified. (aao) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case is stayed and closed per Pretrial Order #80 in 20-MD-2924-RLR. Closing Case. (aao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16508446, filed by Linda Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wichmann, Lawana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
